CMC JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Nearly Forty Percent of Families Face an Extraordinary Medical, Auto or Tax Payment Annually, New JPMorgan Chase Institute Data Show

New JPMorgan Chase Institute data on the financial health of U.S. households show that in any given year almost four in ten families make an extraordinary payment related to medical services, auto repair, or taxes of roughly $1,500, and it’s taking them over a year to recover from major medical expenses. Middle-income households also experienced a nearly $1,300 swing in monthly expenses, which is the equivalent of one month’s rent or mortgage payment.

Coping with Costs: Big Data on Expense Volatility and Medical Payments builds on anonymized account data of roughly 250,000 core Chase checking account customers from January 2013 to December 2015. It is the third in a series of Institute reports evaluating household finances, including its inaugural report, Weathering Volatility: Big Data on the Financial Ups and Downs of US Individuals and its report on income volatility, Paychecks, Paydays and the Online Platform Economy: Big Data on Income Volatility.

This new report found that extraordinary medical payments were most common during tax season and coincided with a 4 percent increase in total income. Families acquired over $900 more in liquid assets before making a major medical payment, yet many families did not recover financially within a year after making a major medical payment. Twelve months after the payment, savings remained depleted for almost half of families (48%) and credit card debt remained elevated for almost a third of families (33%).

“This could be the most granular look at families’ financial volatility we have ever seen,” said Diana Farrell, President and CEO, JPMorgan Chase Institute. “Even with more money in their pocket from tax refunds, the strain of major and unexpected medical costs are hitting families hard and making it difficult for them to recover.”

Following are the key findings for this most recent look at the state of expense volatility for US households.

Key Findings: Coping with Costs: Big Data on Expense Volatility and Medical Payments

  • Finding One: Expenses fluctuate by nearly $1,300 or 29% on a month-to-month basis for median-income households, or $7,391 year-to-year.
    • Discretionary expenses are more volatile than non-discretionary expenses in percentage terms. Month-to-month discretionary expenses fluctuate by 56 percent or $514 while non-discretionary expenses fluctuate by 28 percent or $735.
  • Finding Two: Expense volatility was high across the income and age spectrum. While older families typically had less volatile incomes, they exhibited a larger range of income and expense volatility.
    • Older families maintain similar, if not higher, levels of expense volatility even after significant decreases in income volatility after age 60.
  • Finding Three: Almost four in ten families per year—particularly middle-income and older families—made an extraordinary payment over $1,500 related to medical services, auto repair, or taxes.
    • One in ten families made more than one extraordinary payment in a given year.
    • One in six families (16%) made at least one major medical payment in a given year, including 3% who made two or more.
    • Older Americans had the highest incidence of extraordinary payments across all three types. Forty-four percent of families 65 and older made at least one extraordinary payment compared to that of 22 percent of adults under 25.
  • Finding Four: Extraordinary medical payments were more likely to occur in months with higher income and specifically during tax season.
    • Extraordinary medical payments were most common in March and April and coincided with a 4 percent increase in total income increases. The income increase stemmed mostly from tax refunds and not labor income.
  • Finding Five: Prior to a major medical payment, families garnered significant liquid assets but did not recover financially within 12 months after the payment.
    • Families acquired over $900 more in liquid assets before a major medical payment; this represented a 5 percent increase.
    • The increase in liquid assets is more pronounced for families in the bottom percentile of liquid assets indicating they face a stronger liquidity constraint.
    • Fifty-three percent of families increased their liquid assets one month prior to the medical payment, many of whom immediately spent them down in the month with a medical payment.
    • Many families did not recover financially within a year after a major medical payment. In aggregate, comparing 12 months after the medical payment to the baseline period, income was 3 percent lower, non-medical expenses was 1 percent lower, liquid assets were 2 percent lower, and revolving balance was 9 percent higher.

“Our integrated, high-frequency data on income, expenses, assets, and liabilities shed new light on the connection between physical health and financial health and the reality that families are not fully insured against the economic consequences of major health events,” added Farrell. “This indicates a need for better products and solutions to help families manage expense volatility and become more financially resilient.”

View the full report Coping with Costs: Big Data on Expense Volatility and Medical Payments.

The JPMorgan Chase Institute is a global think tank dedicated to delivering data-rich analyses and expert insights for the public good. Its aim is to help decision makers – policymakers, businesses, and nonprofit leaders – appreciate the scale, granularity, diversity, and interconnectedness of the global economic system and use better facts, timely data, and thoughtful analysis to make smarter decisions to advance global prosperity. Drawing on JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s unique proprietary data, expertise, and market access, the Institute develops analyses and insights on the inner workings of the global economy, frames critical problems, and convenes stakeholders and leading thinkers. For more information visit: jpmorganchaseinstitute.com.

EN
09/02/2017

Underlying

To request access to management, click here to engage with our
partner Phoenix-IR's CorporateAccessNetwork.com

Reports on JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Dave Nicoski ... (+2)
  • Dave Nicoski
  • Ross LaDuke

Vermilion Compass: Weekly Equity Strategy

Momentum Starting to Wane? We remain near-term bullish since our 4/22/25 Compass, and our intermediate-term out-look remains bullish as well (as of our 5/14/25 Compass). It is important to note that markets do not always maintain their upward trajectory at the same pace that we have seen over the last 2-month. We would welcome pullbacks and corrective action to take place. Our nearterm bullish outlook will remain in place long as the S&P 500 (SPX), Nasdaq 100 (QQQ), and Russell 2000 (IWM) are ab...

JPMorgan Chase & Co: 1 director

A director at JPMorgan Chase & Co sold 5,201 shares at 267.443USD and the significance rating of the trade was 67/100. Is that information sufficient for you to make an investment decision? This report gives details of those trades and adds context and analysis to them such that you can judge whether these trading decisions are ones worth following. Included in the report is a detailed share price chart which plots discretionary trades by all the company's directors over the last two years cle...

Moody's Ratings affirms JPMorgan Chase's servicer quality (SQ) assessm...

Moody's Ratings (Moody's) has affirmed the SQ2+ servicer quality assessments for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") as a servicer of prime and subprime residential mortgage loans. We also affirmed the company's servicer quality assessment of SQ2+ as a master servicer. As of June 2024, the company...

Dave Nicoski ... (+2)
  • Dave Nicoski
  • Ross LaDuke

Vermilion Macro Vision: Sector Synopsis

STRATEGY Market dynamics remain risk-on, and our outlook remains bullish as long as the S&P 500 remains above 5850 and 5600-5670. Shorter-term, the S&P 500 remains above the prior bull flag support (currently 5900) that we have discussed over the past two weeks in our Compass reports, and is coiling for a likely breakout above 6100 resistance. As discussed throughout the first half of January in our Compass reports, we continue to believe that tariffs will mostly be used as a negotiation tacti...

ResearchPool Subscriptions

Get the most out of your insights

Get in touch