PII Polaris Inc.

EQUITY ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Announces Filing of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Polaris Industries Inc.

Rosen Law Firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Polaris Industries Inc. securities (NYSE:PII) from January 26, 2016 through September 11, 2016, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Polaris investors under the federal securities laws.

To join the Polaris class action, go to the firm’s website at http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-951.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for more information on the class action.

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.

According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period defendants issued false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Polaris was unable to sufficiently validate the initially identified repair for certain of its recalled RZR vehicles; (ii) Polaris would ultimately need to implement a more complex and expensive repair solution; (iii) the financial impact of RZR vehicle recalls was therefore greater than Polaris had disclosed to investors; (iv) Polaris had overstated its full-year 2016 guidance; and (v) as a result of the foregoing, Polaris’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than November 15, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to the firm’s website at http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-951.html for more information. You may also contact Phillip Kim or Kevin Chan of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at [email protected] or [email protected].

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.

EN
26/09/2016

Underlying

To request access to management, click here to engage with our
partner Phoenix-IR's CorporateAccessNetwork.com

Reports on Polaris Inc.

Polaris Inc: 1 director

A director at Polaris Inc sold 4,554 shares at 67.525USD and the significance rating of the trade was 50/100. Is that information sufficient for you to make an investment decision? This report gives details of those trades and adds context and analysis to them such that you can judge whether these trading decisions are ones worth following. Included in the report is a detailed share price chart which plots discretionary trades by all the company's directors over the last two years clearly show...

Polaris Inc.: Update to credit analysis

Our credit view of this issuer reflects its utility customers for off-road vehicles temper demand fluctuations, offset by its competitive industry.

Moody's Ratings assigns Baa3 rating to Polaris' new senior unsecured n...

Moody's Ratings (Moody's) assigned a Baa3 rating to the new senior unsecured notes of Polaris Inc. (Polaris). All other ratings are unaffected. The outlook remains negative. Polaris intends to use the proceeds from the offering of the new notes to repay its $400 million incremental term loan facil...

Moody's Ratings announces completion of a periodic review of ratings o...

Moody's Ratings (Moody's) has completed a periodic review of the ratings of Polaris Inc. and other ratings that are associated with this issuer. The review was conducted through a rating committee held on 29 September 2025 in which we reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the context of ...

ResearchPool Subscriptions

Get the most out of your insights

Get in touch