Report
Tatiana Orlova
EUR 136.80 For Business Accounts Only

Russia Instant Insight: Central bank is due to hold regular policy meeting amid rising geopolitical tensions

Since the previous policy meeting held on 9 February, a new bout of geopolitical tensions has replaced the global market turmoil. As before, we expect the CBR to remain on a steady course and continue easing its policy at the next meeting due on 23 March. We expect a 25bp cut next Friday; meanwhile, the outlook for 2Q now appears cloudier. We think that fiscal policy after the Presidential Election scheduled for 18 March will likely be the main determinant of the path of CBR’s monetary policy in the remainder of 2018.

  • The next CBR policy meeting is going to be held in an atmosphere of rising tensions between Russia and the West, following the poisoning of double agent Skripal and his daughter with a highly toxic nerve agent in the UK. Both the UK and US have announced new sanctions, however, they do not target any assets or terms of doing business with Russian companies or banks.
  • While some EU leaders have joined the chorus of condemnation, we think that the probability of the EU joining any meaningful sanctions is not high.
  • Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions have also risen in Syria where government forces are trying to take control over a suburb of Damascus. Worryingly, Russia has promised to shoot down US missiles if the US launches a strike against Syrian government forces. It appears that Russia and the US have not been so close to direct military confrontation since the Cuban Missile Crisis.
  • On Sunday 18 March, the Russians are heading to ballot boxes to elect their President. Given the guaranteed result of the election, it will likely have a minimal influence on the outcome of the March policy meeting. However, the regulator may finish its easing cycle sooner if the government’s fiscal policy becomes looser after the elections... (see more in the attached file)
Provider
Emerginomics
Emerginomics

WHY EMERGINOMICS?

  • Original take on geopolitical, economic and oil market developments
  • Thematic research on hot topics
  • Face-to-face meetings and presentations upon request
  • Independent views not influenced by the need to comply with a “house view” or priorities imposed from above.

MEET THE FOUNDER. Tatiana Orlova holds a MSc in Economics from the LSE and has worked as an Emerging Market economist and strategist since graduation in 2001. She has been employed in EM research teams in four investment banks covering a diverse range of CEEMEA economies, with a particular specialism in the post-Soviet economies.

Tatiana is a widely known expert on the post-Soviet economies who has given multiple interviews to major world financial media (such as FT, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC etc) and spoken at conferences attended by hundreds of clients. Tatiana’s unique background and experience, as well as her deep knowledge of the region’s economics, history and geopolitical realities, allows her to make accurate forecasts and predictions across the range of Fixed Income instruments. She has covered the region’s hydrocarbon producers during the oil crises of 2008-2009 and 2014-2016, and issued a range of successful calls. Most notably, in September 2014 she predicted that Russia was about to lose its investment grade sovereign rating, which was a highly non-consensus view. Similarly, she correctly called imminent downgrades of sovereign ratings of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan during the following winter. She also has a track record of successful FX and interest rate recommendations.

GET ACCESS TO EXPERTISE IN AN UNDERSUPPLIED MARKET

MIFID II forces big banks to switch to paid subscriptions by Mifid II as of 3 January 2018. Clients who subscribe to standard research packages covering emerging economies in the CEEMEA region may find themselves paying for run-of-the-mill research of variable quality, not always addressing the hottest topics affecting asset prices in a timely manner. Banks have already slimmed down their research teams substantially, and this process will likely continue after the new rules have kicked in. The cuts have already translated in a lack of resources and expertise to provide in-depth macroeconomic coverage, especially of smaller economies in the region.

Analysts
Tatiana Orlova

ResearchPool Subscriptions

Get the most out of your insights

Get in touch