SNAP Snap Inc. Class A

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Snap Inc.

The law firm of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP alerts Snap Inc. (NYSE: SNAP) (“Snap” or the “Company”) shareholders that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s common stock: (i) issued pursuant and/or traceable to Snap’s initial public offering (“IPO”) on or about March 2, 2017; and (ii) on the open market between March 2, 2017 and May 15, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

Shareholders who wish to discuss this action and their legal options are encouraged to contact Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (Darren J. Check, Esq., D. Seamus Kaskela, Esq. or Adrienne O. Bell, Esq.) at (888) 299-7706 or at [email protected].

Snap shareholders who purchased securities during the Class Period may, no later than July 17, 2017, seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class. For additional information, or to learn how to participate in this action, please visit https://www.ktmc.com/new-cases/snap-inc#join.

Snap provides technology and social media services, and is the parent company of the popular Snapchat mobile application. Snap completed its IPO on or around March 2, 2017, selling 230 million shares of stock to investors at $17.00 per share for gross proceeds of $3.91 billion.

The shareholder class action complaint alleges that Snap made a series of materially false and misleading statements to investors about the Company’s reported user growth. As further detailed in the complaint, on May 10, 2017, Snap issued its first quarterly report as a public company, and disclosed disappointing user growth (the slowest year-to-year growth rate in at least two years) at the Company’s Snapchat messaging platform. Following this news, shares of the Company’s stock fell $4.93 per share, or over 21%, to close on May 11, 2017 at $18.05.

On May 16, 2017, Bloomberg reported that a former Snap employee filed a lawsuit against Snap, “claim[ing] he was fired after three weeks on the job for raising questions about allegedly false growth metrics [and] seeking whistleblower protection against retaliation by [the] company.”

Snap shareholders may, no later than July 17, 2017, seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class through Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, or other counsel, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed as a lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member’s claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class in the action. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision of whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff.

Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check prosecutes class actions in state and federal courts throughout the country. Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check is a driving force behind corporate governance reform, and has recovered billions of dollars on behalf of institutional and individual investors from the United States and around the world. The firm represents investors, consumers and whistleblowers (private citizens who report fraudulent practices against the government and share in the recovery of government dollars). The complaint in this action was not filed by Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check. For more information about Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, please visit www.ktmc.com.

EN
22/05/2017

Underlying

To request access to management, click here to engage with our
partner Phoenix-IR's CorporateAccessNetwork.com

Reports on Snap Inc. Class A

Snap Inc: 1 director

A director at Snap Inc sold/gave away 2,805,456 shares at 0.000USD and the significance rating of the trade was 68/100. Is that information sufficient for you to make an investment decision? This report gives details of those trades and adds context and analysis to them such that you can judge whether these trading decisions are ones worth following. Included in the report is a detailed share price chart which plots discretionary trades by all the company's directors over the last two years cl...

Dan Salmon
  • Dan Salmon

US Internet 1Q25 Update Better than feared, but still choppy ahead

We update models for our US Internet coverage following earnings, with estimates and target valuations generally higher.

Dan Salmon
  • Dan Salmon

US Internet: What we know (and don’t know) about China/de minimis adve...

On Monday, we analyzed GOOGL and META’s potential exposure to China-based advertisers HERE, and discussed META’s exposure more HERE. Last night, SNAP cited weakness from advertisers impacted by changes to the de mimimus exemption as one example of the macro uncertainty that led it to pull 2Q25 guidance (see HERE for full takeaways). Led by Temu and Shein, there is likely high overlap between China-based retailers and those impacted by de minimis exemption changes.

Dan Salmon
  • Dan Salmon

Tariff Impact Part III: The other shoe drops – lower company estimates...

Yesterday, we lowered estimates for eCommerce and digital ad spending HERE. In this report, the other shoe drops and we lower estimates and targets across our coverage.

Dan Salmon
  • Dan Salmon

Snap Inc. (SNAP, Buy, $16 target) 4Q24 Model Update (Buy, target lower...

Our target declines to $16 from $17 owing to lower estimates, partially offset by a higher valuation owing to growing long-term revenue potential after SNAP’s advertiser base doubled in 2024, while Snapchat+ continues to layer in a more predictable subscription revenue stream.

ResearchPool Subscriptions

Get the most out of your insights

Get in touch