Report
Patrick Artus

To reduce income inequality: Public or "private" redistribution?

We will use the example of France to illustrate our analysis. To reduce income inequality, one can first use public redistribution: public transfer payments to the lowest income earners, progressive taxation on incomes. But such redistribution reaches a limit: its financing requires an increase in the tax burden, with the associated negative effects on employment in particular. We can then consider another type of redistribution, i.e. private redistribution. It works as follows: Low wages in a number of sectors are increased; Companies in these sectors then raise their selling prices, thus avoiding a negative effect of the rise in low wages on low-skilled employment; Other wages are not modified or indexed to price increases (which also prevents a macroeconomic cost competitiveness problem). There is then redistribution in favour of people with low wages, financed by a tax (linked to the rise in prices) on other households.
Provider
Natixis
Natixis

Based across the world’s leading financial centers, Natixis CIB Research offers an integrated view of the markets. The team provides support to inform Natixis clients’ investment and hedging decisions across all asset classes.

 

Analysts
Patrick Artus

Other Reports from Natixis
Christopher HODGE ... (+2)
  • Christopher HODGE
  • Jonathan PINGLE

ResearchPool Subscriptions

Get the most out of your insights

Get in touch