Report
Patrick Artus

What went wrong in the euro zone in 2017?

Until 2016, non-resident long-term capital inflows were of similar size and fairly high in the United States and the euro zone . From 2017, non-resident long-term capital inflows remained at a high level in the United States , while the euro zone suddenly switched to non-resident long-term capital outflows. What went wrong in the euro zone in 2017? Productivity gains stopped rising in the euro zone, making it less attractive than the United States; Manufacturing production stopped growing due to the emergence of recruitment difficulties and a shortage of available equipment; The rate of investment in new technologies has been rising rapidly in the United States since 2016, but not in the euro zone; the same holds for R&D spending; The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 reduced the tax rate on profits repatriated to the United States from 35% to 15.5%; US stock market indices have been rising significantly faster than European indices since mid-2017.
Provider
Natixis
Natixis

Based across the world’s leading financial centers, Natixis CIB Research offers an integrated view of the markets. The team provides support to inform Natixis clients’ investment and hedging decisions across all asset classes.

 

Analysts
Patrick Artus

Other Reports from Natixis

ResearchPool Subscriptions

Get the most out of your insights

Get in touch