F Ford Motor Company

Hagens Berman: Court Certifies Nine Classes of Consumers in Ford MyFord Touch Lawsuit

A U.S. District Court judge today certified classes of consumers from nine states in a lawsuit filed against Ford (NYSE: F) stating that its MyFord Touch and MyLincoln Touch touchscreen systems are defective, often crashing and freezing while the vehicle is in motion, failing to respond to repeated voice and touch commands, providing inaccurate GPS information and unable to connect to mobile phones and iPods, according to Hagens Berman.

The classes of certified consumers includes those who purchased at least one vehicle from Ford equipped with MyFord Touch from nine states, including California, Colorado, Massachusetts, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Virginia and Washington.

The lawsuit states that the MyFord Touch “infotainment” touchscreen systems often crash and freeze while the vehicle is in motion, fail to respond to repeated voice and touch commands, provide inaccurate GPS information and are unable to connect to mobile phones and iPods.

Plaintiffs within the certified classes will now move forward with the completion of merits, expert discovery and summary judgment motion practice. According to Hagens Berman, plaintiffs look forward to bringing their claims to trial, which is currently scheduled for April 2017 in front of the Honorable Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California.

“While we are appreciative of the court’s careful consideration of the class in this case against Ford, we will continue to fight for the rights of all consumers who paid a heavy premium for dangerous, defective in-car touchscreen systems,” said Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman and the attorney representing vehicle owners. “We will continue to fight for the rights of everyone affected by Ford’s misconduct and hope to include more states of certified classes.”

The lawsuit was first brought in 2013 on behalf of owners of Ford and Lincoln vehicles equipped with the MyFord Touch or MyLincoln Touch systems, which were introduced by Ford in 2010. According to the third amended complaint, Ford promised consumers the ability to seamlessly operate audio controls, use a GPS navigation system, make phone calls, manage control climate systems and play music straight from their smartphone, but what they received was far from seamless.

Plaintiffs allege that Ford was aware of the problem even before the first MyFord Touch and MyLincoln Touch-equipped vehicles were delivered to consumers. Since the launch of the system, Ford has issued several technical service bulletins and software updates, with no fix in sight. In addition, the complaint documents a number of consumer complaints in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s database, all detailing issues with the touchscreen system. The complaint also chronicles the MyFord Touch/MyLincoln Touch problems experienced by Ford’s own employees, dealers and executives.

“At best, what consumers paid for amounted to a pricey inconvenience, failing to live up to even the most basic of Ford’s gilded promises,” Berman said. “But in the worst scenarios, the failed MyFord Touch system’s defects can be a hazardous distraction to drivers.”

Judge Chen’s order highlights the debacle of Ford’s unsuccessful fixes: “…while Ford argues that ‘each new software version fixed bugs,’ such that any problems with the various software versions are not identical (Opp. at 33, 4), Plaintiffs have introduced statements from Ford suggesting that the attempted fixes were unsuccessful. See Ex. 160 (referring to the fixes as ‘lipstick on [a] pig’).”

According to the suit, the system fails even while controlling crucial vehicle functions, such as the defroster and rear-view camera, which are controlled through the system, putting drivers and passengers at risk. The MyFord Touch systems also reportedly failed to provide reliable GPS navigation, and can suddenly turn off and back on with a message saying it is “performing scheduled maintenance,” leaving the driver without any ability to operate a multitude of critical functions while the vehicle is in motion.

About Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP is a consumer-rights class-action law firm with offices in 10 cities. The firm has been named to the National Law Journal’s Plaintiffs’ Hot List eight times. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

EN
28/09/2016

Underlying

To request access to management, click here to engage with our
partner Phoenix-IR's CorporateAccessNetwork.com

Reports on Ford Motor Company

Ford Motor Co: 1 director

A director at Ford Motor Co sold 60,000 shares at 11.250USD and the significance rating of the trade was 76/100. Is that information sufficient for you to make an investment decision? This report gives details of those trades and adds context and analysis to them such that you can judge whether these trading decisions are ones worth following. Included in the report is a detailed share price chart which plots discretionary trades by all the company's directors over the last two years clearly s...

Pierre FerraguÊ
  • Pierre FerraguÊ

Bible 1Q25 – Autos: recovery on track. Expect strong momentum through ...

Today, we are publishing the automotive section of our 27th Tech Infrastructure Quarterly Bible. The Tech Bible is a must-read for any tech investor, as it summarizes the quarterly earnings reports from the over 140 companies we track, providing an update on our key perspectives and convictions. Auto semi revenues declined, reflecting the ongoing inventory correction. However, nearly all companies have now called the bottom. We expect strong sequential momentum through 2025, which should suppor...

Julie Boote
  • Julie Boote

PSA Autos / New Mobility: Review of Auto Stocks in Light of Import Tar...

As US auto tariffs remain in place, investors need to assess whether auto-related government negotiations will be successful, and what automakers can do to mitigate the potential surge in costs. Analyst Julie Boote reviews potential outcomes.

Pierre FerraguÊ
  • Pierre FerraguÊ

Bible 4Q24 – Autos: a trough is emerging. One of our favored semi sect...

Today, we are publishing the Automotive section of our 26th Tech Infrastructure Quarterly Bible. The Tech Bible is a must-read for any tech investor, as it summarizes the quarterly earnings reports from the over 140 companies we track, providing an update on our key perspectives and convictions. In the coming weeks we will publish sections on Cloud Infrastructure, Memory, Telecom Equipment, Enterprise IT, Ride sharing & Delivery, and Foundry. Auto semi revenues declined sharply as the industry ...

ResearchPool Subscriptions

Get the most out of your insights

Get in touch